APPRAISAL OF LAND DISPUTE RESOLUTION UNDER YORUBA CUSTOMARY LAW

Background to the study

Land, probably the most important source of shelter and wealth in a developing country, can always be subject of a great many interests and derivative rights((Agara v. Agunbiade[2013] All FWLR pt. 683 p. 1899 at 1919 para. D)). These are often difficult to elucidate, and where land is subject to native customary tenure, it is always the subject of rights and interests vested in both the individual and group, and such rights and interests are frequently co-existent with each other.

The customary land tenure system is a form of land holding indigenous to Nigeria. The evolution of this system and the various principles regulating same, exhibit the historical credentials rooted in the customs and traditions of different ethno-cultural groupings in Nigeria over a period of time. Essentially, the principles regulating the customary land tenure system appears uniform throughout the country but the fact remains that they vary in their details as a result of diversities in the customs, traditions and values of each tribe.

Generally, ‘land’ is said to include any building and any other thing attached to the earth or permanently fastened to anything so attached, but does not include minerals.((Coker, G. B. A., 1958. Family Property among the Yorubas. London. Sweet and Maxwell, p. 26)) Actual physical control of native lands is vested in the families and only in the sense that it is an aggregate of the constituent family groups could the community or tribe be said to own the land.((Coker, ibid p. 24))

 

 

Download Full Material-N5000

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

AN APPRAISAL OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRIVATIZATION AND REFORM PROGRAMME FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR IN NIGERIA

AN APPRAISAL OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRIVATIZATION AND REFORM PROGRAMME FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR IN NIGERIA

Abstract:

This Research Study titled: “AN APPRAISAL OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRIVATIZATION AND REFORM PROGRAMME FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR IN NIGERIA” was chosen after a careful review of the process and nature of the legal framework put in place in some relevant Nigeria legislations such as the Public Enterprises (Privatization and Commercialization Act) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) 2004 (being the governing law on privatization of public enterprises) and the Electric Power Sector Reform Act No 6 2005, which provides the legal framework for the reform of the Energy Utilities in Nigeria. The Research Study explains the rationale for the implementation of the Privatization Programme in Nigeria, discusses the legal framework put in place for its implementation in order to guarantees investors’ confidence in the privatization programme and processes which should be open, transparent and sustainable as well as backed up by a strong will demonstrated by the Government at the centre. The Research Study provides an overview of the energy sector in Nigeria to include majorly, the electric power sector and the oil and gas industry and touches on the various policies and Legal Frameworks established for the privatization and reform of the Electricity Sector in Nigeria. In the same vein, the research study also highlight the key provisions of some relevant Laws that guide exploration and production of oil and gas in Nigeria over the past years such as the Petroleum Act, 2004 and the Deep Offshore, Inland Basin Production Sharing Contract Act 2004 (DOA), Petroleum (Drilling and Production) Regulations 1995 to name a few. The Research Study presents a critical appraisal of the various legal provisions that govern the regulatory institutions, evaluates the achievements or performance of the regulatory institutions (in relation to their regulatory mandates) set up to implement the Federal Government of Nigeria’s privatization programme for the electricity sector and reform of the sector, and suggest or recommend ways of improving on the effectiveness/efficiency of these institutions going forward. The Research Study stressed the critical relevance of the reform of the Energy Sector in Nigeria to the sustenance and ix growth of the national economy and therefore strongly recommend amongst others, the vigorous execution of the FGN’s reform programme for the energy sector and the strengthening of regulatory capacities of the agencies and institutions of Government that have been mandated to execute the said reform programmes. The Research Study noted that it was therefore imperative that scheduled timelines for specific privatization milestones are strictly adhered to and pursued with the seriousness it deserve and for the overall benefit of Nigerians. The Nigerian Energy Sector has suffered serious setback arising from poor infrastructure situation and improper handling and management of Energy Utilities hence the call for a reform of the sector, the objective of this thesis is to take an academic excursion into the nature of legal framework that exist and support the privatization and reform of the said Energy sector in Nigeria and make far reaching recommendations on how to strengthen the governing legal framework for the Energy sector in Nigeria which for purpose of this study is restricted to the Electricity Power Sector and to some extent, suggest or make recommendations on the proposed oil and gas sector reform in Nigeria. This research work was chosen with the aim of broadening knowledge and academic literature on privatization and reform of the Energy Sector in Nigeria generally and in particular, provide a medium for making specific academic contributions towards developing legal issues arising from the legal framework for the privatization and reform of the said Energy Sector Nigeria

Download Full Material-N5000

PROTECTION OF WOMEN AGAINST DISCRIMINATORY LAWS, POLICIES AND PRACTICES IN NIGERIA: AN APPRAISAL

PROTECTION OF WOMEN AGAINST DISCRIMINATORY LAWS, POLICIES AND PRACTICES IN NIGERIA: AN APPRAISAL

Abstract:

Human rights are rights that have come to be guaranteed over time, to all men and women, irrespective of race or creed. These rights extend to even the unborn, in certain circumstances. However, in many societies, women are subject to discriminatory tendencies in the form of laws, policies and practices that derogate from their human rights, simply became of their gender. Many international instruments have been put in place to stem these negative tendencies, especially through the works of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the International Labour Organization (I.L.O) In Nigeria, for instance, women tend to suffer inequalities in the social, political , economic and cultural fields. This is notwithstanding the fact that there are formal provisions on the statute books that guarantees equality to all before the law. As the ‘grundnorm,’ all the Constitution made for Nigeria with their fundamental rights provisions envisage equality of all citizens, whether male or female. The Thesis finds that the envisaged equality is at best formal and not actual, even though the country is a party to international conventions and instruments that provide for equal enjoyment of human rights by both genders. Some laws, cultural practices and traditions have been fingered in restricting and derogating from the enjoyment of basic rights by women. This thesis sets out to identify derogations from women’s rights, its effects and proffer suggestions on how to curtail these gustative tendencies, with particular reference to Nigeria.

Download Full Material-N5000

APPRAISAL OF THE CONTEMPORARY JURISPRUDENCE ON THE RIGHT TO ENVIRONMENT

APPRAISAL OF THE CONTEMPORARY JURISPRUDENCE ON THE RIGHT TO ENVIRONMENT: A CASE STUDY OF NIGERIA AND SOUTH AFRICA

ABSTRACT

The thesis explores environmental rights protection in Nigeria and South Africa. The research questions are: Are the identified elements of environmental rights reflected in the law and policy of Nigeria? What role has regulatory bodies, the judiciary and civil society played in promoting and protecting the right to a healthy environment in Nigeria and South Africa? What are the social, political and economic factors affecting the implementation and enforcement of environmental rights in Nigeria and South Africa? What are the obstacles to using legal processes for environmental protection in Nigeria? The objectives of the thesis include: to find out whether there is promotion and protection of the right to a healthy environment in Nigeria and South Africa; to find out the factors, if any, responsible for inefficient and ineffective promotion and protection of the right to a healthy environment; to find out the greatest obstacles to using legal processes for environmental protection in Nigeria and to proffer suggestions to make the promotion and protection of the right to a healthy environment effective and efficient. The research is situated in the historical context of environmental degradation in Nigeria and South Africa, where patterns of environmental degradation and pollution are rooted in decades and centuries of massive natural resource exploitation that benefitted a tiny minority while adversely affecting the majority of citizens. Nigeria and South Africa are the largest economies in Africa and face major environmental challenges. Both countries share the Common Law tradition and are state parties to the African Charter on Human and Peoples‘ Rights. The different approaches to environmental rights protection in their respective constitutions and legislations also provide a fertile ground for comparison. Doctrinal research (documents), interviews and questionnaires provide the data. Data was analysed via descriptive analysis. This thesis finds that framing the right to a healthy environment as a justiciable fundamental right offers many advantages over directive policy principles and it would not hamper development activities that are guided by environmental laws. The advantages include enlarged access to justice in environmental matters; relaxation of rules of legal standing; entrenching public participation in environmental management; increased accountability and adherence to due process by corporations and government; and increasing the importance of environment in the public consciousness. Other advantages include: an enhanced role for human rights bodies; development of environmental rights jurisprudence; and empowering citizens in implementation and enforcement thereby complementing efforts of environmental protection agencies. Findings from the thesis are that although Nigeria has environmental rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples‘ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, the absence of a direct, justiciable environmental right in the Nigerian Constitution has rendered the environmental right ineffectual. Factors affecting environmental law enforcement in Nigeria include ignorance of citizens; lack of capacity of environmental agencies, corruption; and lack of political will. In South Africa, the high economic cost of remediating legacy environmental problems,competing socio-economic challenges and the economic and political clout of large corporate polluters are major factors affecting the enjoyment of the environmental right enshrined in the Constitution. Compared to South Africa, Nigeria is weak in public participation, access to justice, environmental data and the development of environmental rights jurisprudence. Major hindrances to using legal processes to achieve environmental protection in Nigeria include: ignorance by the public of the legal framework; inordinate delay in the judicial system; high cost of litigation and restrictive rules of locus standi. These have contributed to a trend in which oil-producing Nigerian communities adversely affected by environmental degradation are suing multinational oil companies in their parent countries. From the survey, majority of legal practitioners are in favour of amending the Nigerian Constitution to make the right to a healthy environment justiciable. They are also in support of interpreting fundamental rights to life, human dignity and property to encompass environmental protection.

CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

In an era of looming global environmental crises from climate change and environmental degradation it is indisputable that the quality of human life is tied to the quality of the environment. The quality of life and man‘s existence is adversely affected by various environmental problems, for which man is the major architect. Those who suffer most from environmental disasters and adverse effects of climate change are the poor, disadvantaged and vulnerable segments of the society and these are found mostly in developing and underdeveloped countries.
The sheer scale of environmental issues at the national and global levels means that national action by itself, while important, is insufficient, and that significant international cooperation is required. Thus environmental protection, like human rights, has evolved through a process of national concern to the stage of internationalisation and globalisation.
A significant development in the global development of environmental law is the articulation of the link between the human rights discourse and environmental jurisprudence. The first formal recognition of the link between the environment and human rights is Principle 1 of the 1972 United Nations Declaration on the Human Environment which declared that man has the ―fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits of a life of dignity and wellbeing…‖ A healthy environment has thus been internationally acknowledged as a prerequisite to the effective enjoyment of human rights.
The growth in the magnitude of environmental problems, increasing awareness of environmental issues, increasing recognition of the importance of the environment to the realisation of the right to life and other human rights, and hence the need to provide for

constitutional environmental protection all contributed to the conceptualization of environment in terms of a right.
Recognition of the right to a healthy or safe environment finds expression in regional human rights treaties1 and constitutional guarantees on the environment. It has also resulted in the development of environmental rights jurisprudence. The growing trend of recognition of constitutional environmental rights is illustrated by a recent study that analysed national constitutions. Out of 192 national constitutions, environmental protection was incorporated in one form or the other in 140 national constitutions with 86 constitutions explicitly recognizing the right to a healthy environment.2
Nigeria and South Africa provide valuable material for in-depth national studies on environmental rights jurisprudence. In the past decades Nigeria and South Africa have experienced major developments in the area of environmental protection. The adoption of a new legal order in South Africa has seen the adoption of a national Constitution that provides for a substantive environmental right. It is worthy to note that the Constitution and framework environmental law was the product of wide ranging consultations at all levels of the society. There has also been a dramatic rise in environmental activism and this has been well documented.3
In Nigeria, the return to democratic rule after almost two decades of unbroken military rule (with its attendant human rights abuses), has seen a rising awareness of human rights and some increase in environmental awareness. The national Constitution, introduced in 1999 at the restoration of democratic civilian rule, followed the post-1972 trend of constitutionalisingDownload Full Material-N5000