CRITICAL EXAMINATION ON CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF LAND IN NIGERIA

CRITICAL EXAMINATION ON CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF LAND IN NIGERIA

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

A contract of sale of land is the first stage in a conveyancing transaction by which the purchase acquires equitable interest on the property and legal interest in acquired later at the completion stage. Unfortunately, this important stage in conveyancing is usually ignored by Nigerians. The parties must have capacity; there must be an offer, an acceptance, a consideration an intention to enter into a legally binding relationship, in addition to the above, the special nature of the commodity on sale makes the sale of land to be regulated very closely by common law, the general principles of equity. Customary law, and statutes. Conveyancing is a generic property or interest in real property from one party to another. Sale or contract for sale of land is a major part of property law
practice in Nigeria. In the process, interest in land is transferred from a party to another, it is not just a mere agreement to purchase such land or the payment of price, but a complete procedure which has to be followed such as, the agreement to transfer interest in land, agreement and the payment of agreed price.

Download Full Material-N5000

Related Post

HUMAN RIGHTS IN NIGERIA: LAW AND PRACTICE

HUMAN RIGHTS IN NIGERIA: LAW AND PRACTICE

TABLE OF CONTENT

Title Page———i

Certification——–ii

Dedication———iii

Acknowledgement——-iv

Abstract ———vi

Table of Content——–vii

Chapter One

1.0 Introduction ——-1

1.1 Statement of Problem——4

1.2 Purpose of the Study——5

1.3 Significance of Study——8

1.4 Limitation——–9

1.5 Scope of Study——-11

Chapter Two

2.0 Review of Related Literature —-12

2.6 Summary of Literature Review—- 19

Chapter Three

3.0 Research Methodology and Procedure—22

3.1 Population ——–22

3.2 Sample and Sampling Technique—-22

3.3 Validation of the Instrument —-23

3.4 Reliability of the Instrument —–23

3.5 Data Analysis——-23

Chapter Four

4.0 Presentation and Discussion of Result—24

4.1 Analysis and interpretaion of Data—25

4.2 Discussion of Results——38

Chapter Five

5.0 Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation –40

5.1 Summary——–40

5.2 Conclusion——–41

5.3 Recommendation——42

References ———45

Appendix 1——–47

Appendix ———50

Download Full Material-N5000

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAWS

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAWS

Abstract:

The fundamental target of both Islamic law of war and international Humanitarian law is to protect the Rights and Persons of both combatants and non-combatants during and after the hostilities thus, the amount and extent of violence applied in war must be limited to achieving military objective, that is to subdue the enemy, such an action/violence should be proportionate, in other words, there should be a clear distinction between combatants and non-combatants, meaning, the law restricts both the means and method of waging war and object against which such means may be employed. Thus, civilians and civilian objectives must not be made the object of direct attack, they should be accorded necessary protection against the dangerts arising from military operation, such as indiscriminate attack that is expected to cause incidental less of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects or a combination thereof which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. In the same vein, a combatant who can no longer take part in hostility due to sickness or surrender should not be attacked or killed, but should be accorded all necessary protection as provided under protocol, and by extension all other prisoners of war, as contain under the third Geneva convention of 1949 as well articles 14 and 75 (2) of protocol 1 of 1977 additional to Geneva convention. So in essence, both Islamic law of war and International Humanitarian law granted protection to all civilian population, i.e. women, children, religious personnel aged persons and all other categories of persons who did not take part in hostility through any other means as well as their objects. They also extended such protection to combatants who are incapable to continue with hostility as a result of injury or surrender. Violation of any forbidden act or non-performance of any required act under both Islamic law of war and International Humanitarian law is considered as war crime. The main objective of this research work is therefore to provide: A comparison of Islamic law and International Humanitarian Laws by examining the rights of individuals both combatants and noncombatants, during and after armed conflict situations. To examine the sources of the said two legal systems. To examine the purpose of war under the said two legal systems. To determine war crimes under the two legal systems as well as their punishment. To examine the differences between the two legal systems. To fill in the vacuum left by learned jurists in the two legal systems, and to offer some suggestions on how to fill the said vacuum as well as to further develop same. Chapter 1, contains, General introduction to Islamic law of war and international Humanitarian law, statement of the problem, objective of study, scope and limitation of research, justification and literature review. Chapter 2, traces the origin and development of Islamic law of war as well as examining the rights of both combatants and noncombatants under this legal system Chapter 3, is exclusively dedicated to deal with international Humanitarian law, wherein, origin and development of the said legal system is examine, as well as the rights of both combatants and non-combatants. Chapter 4, is on the analysis of the rights of individuals both combatants and non-combatants, under both Islamic law of war and International Humanitarian laws, as well as areas of disagreement between them. Chapter 5, Summaryized the entire research work and makes some concluding remarks which include conclusion and recommendation

Download Full Material-N5000

AN APPRAISAL OF INCOME TAX ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES UNDER THE NIGERIAN TAX SYSTEM

ABSTRACT

The imposition, collection and administration of income tax in Nigeria are basically statutory, which had undergone significant reforms with the object of providing solutions to the lingering problems of enforcement procedures. The existing body of literature on taxpayer compliance developed over the years in Nigeria. Nigeria made considerable investment in tax legislative reforms, taxpayer education programs, tax enforcement strategies, and sophisticated system of tax administration using new technologies. However, what prompted this research work is that despite those reforms, reviews and changes in the legislation compared to its counterparts, Nigeria faced quite different challenges and constraints that require careful consideration in designing appropriate and effective tax system. In particular, the tax system in Nigeria must foster sustainable economic growth, ensuring that the necessary revenue collections are made to provide for political stability, investment in infrastructure and improved standards of living. The method of acquiring data and information used in this research work was doctrinal, where two main sources of acquiring data, i.e. primary source, which consist of statutes and case laws and secondary source which consists relevant information from leading authorities, textbooks on tax laws and practices, writings and articles of scholars, magazines, opinions of jurists, journals, periodicals, seminar papers, as well as internet/websites, etc. were also used. the findings of the research work were that; (i) Nigeria has both limited administrative resources and expertise, (ii) Tax administration is generally weak, with widespread evasion, corruption and coercion, (iii) Furthermore, taxpayers tend to have low levels of literacy, low tax morale and negative attitudes towards government, (iv) The cash economy, and its inherent opportunities for engagement in fraud and tax evasion, often plays a major role. (v) There is also conflict of tax jurisdiction between the Federal Government and states, and lack of public enlightenment. The central aim of this research appraised the income tax enforcement procedures, and the objectives identified and highlighted their problems and prospects, with particular reference to the relevant Nigerian Tax Laws. The research work finally provided workable suggestions and recommendations to the identified problems to enhance an effective and efficient tax administration in Nigeria. The findings of this research work explored recent issues, challenges and recent ideas of judges/decisions of courts in respect of income Tax under the Nigerian Tax System and Fiscal policies which, if appropriately utilized, will bring enormous change and enhance the Nigerian tax system generally. It also improved the existing enforcement procedures of the Nigerian tax system both at the Federal, states and local levels.

 

CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION

  • Background to the Study

 

Income tax is one of the major sources of revenue to all governments world- wide, including Nigeria. It is levied by governments to raise revenue that will help in the administration of governmental policies. The role of each government is, first, to provide good governance. Good governance, on the other hand, simply means provision of basic infrastructures, to meet the basic needs of citizens in an atmosphere where peace and security are guaranteed. Revenues generated through income tax enable government to maintain law and order and other socio-economic, political and cultural activities. In order to attain this, every government must put in place a rational income tax system where tax payments are made by every tax-payer and the canons of taxation upheld.

Over the years, the Nigerian tax system has undergone significant changes. The tax laws have been reviewed with the aim of repealing the obsolete taxing laws to enhance effective means for procedures of enforcing the payment of income tax to meet up with the current demands of the Nigerian fiscal programmes and to reduce tax evasion and tax avoidance in the Nigerian tax system.

Nigerian tax system is basically and purely statutory. The tax system, therefore, featured wide range of statutes by which the Nigerian government, as a whole, seeks to

charge and collect taxes for public expenditures. Hence, there has been a requirement that if at all government was to interfere with property, pry into a man’s affairs and take his money, then, this must be on clear statutory authority1. This requirement is premised on the need to protect the individual from the state2. It is trite that, any tax which is not prescribed by law is illegal and unenforceable. It was held, in the case of Seven up Bottling Company v. Lagos State Internal Revenue Board,3 that:

It has often been the view of the Courts here and elsewhere that if a person sought to be taxed comes within the letter of the law, then such a person must be taxed. On the other hand, if the tax authority seeking to recover tax from a person is unable to bring him within “the letter of the law”, the person will be free, however apparently within the spirit of the law his case ought to otherwise appear to be.Download Full Material-N5000