LEGAL APPRAISAL OF TAXATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN NIGERIA

LEGAL APPRAISAL OF TAXATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN NIGERIA

ABSTRACT

The tax regime of small and medium business enterprises was a snow ball of international agitation specially international monetary fund (IMF). To Nigeria Government to diversify her revenue base from Petroleum tax which consisted of 80% percent of the total revenue. Consequentially, the idea of SMBE tax was introduced in furtherance of tax reforms a committee was constituted in 1991 and January 1993, after the feasibility study of SMBE the report submitted to the Federal government with a recommendation to introduce SMBE Tax. On the other hand, the government viewed Small and Medium Business Enterprises as a very important sector of the economy that has employed many persons. Most big companies started at this level before progressive and attractive. That is why the government has paid special attention to it and as a sector to the Nigerian economy, it is still not progressing as expected and the resultant effect is still far beyond expectations. The objectives of this research are to analyze the effect of tax policy in the growth of SMBE in Nigeria. The methodology employed in this work is the doctrinal method. The problem of this research is despite the tax policies put in place for rapid growth of the sectors in returns for the government to drive huge revenue from it has fail because it is not in commiseration with the government intensions as a result of the following? Over taxation is also a problem of SMBE that is meant to be promoted, encouraged and made very attractive for potential investors in the country and the world as a whole. Also it reveled that tax collectors are not well trained and informed about government policies as regards the protection and encouragement of Small and Medium business Enterprises in Nigeria. Most particularly, they do not consider the size of a particular business in tax assessment. To proffer some solutions, tax assessment and collection should be defined with respect to which government should collect certain taxes from Small and Medium business Enterprises. This will avoid the three tiers of government collecting taxes from the same particular organization. Government should also put a policy in place to avoid illegal taxes, such as community levy, boys or youth levy as well as  association or union levy, also Some of the findings arrived at in this study are absence of a harmonized and gazzetted tax regime, which would enable manufactures to build in recognized and approved levies and taxes payable and also the fact that an effective administration of this sector is lacking there should be an average or tax exemption placed on these young industries to encourage and protect them and to attract  potential investors.

CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION

       Background To The Study

 

In any given economy, the issue of taxation is of tremendous importance because it serves as revenue generation forum to the government hence; its role cannot be in doubt. Taxation can also be employed as an instrument of economic policy formulation and implementation including a means of wealth redistribution in the economy.

Small and Medium Business Enterprises (SMBE) are newly introduced tax policy for revenue generation income and redistribution. Thus, taxes are a source of revenue to the government. In its first month of operation SMBE in this country yielded revenue of N5.4 billion to the government. Apart from petroleum tax, it is obvious that no other form of taxation either direct or indirect equal the revenue yield of SMBE.1

Consequently, the idea of SMBE tax was introduced in furtherance of tax reforms. The Federal Government set up in 1991 a study group to review the country‘s indirect tax system.2 The study group among other things recommended the administration of SMBE tax in Nigeria and the government accepted the recommendation and therefore, set up a SMBE committee which carried out a feasibility study on SMBE and came up with a report submitted to the Federal Government with a recommendation to introduce SMBE tax in the country in January 1993.3

In addition, a full scale of SMBE tax in Nigeria which extended from the manufacturers through the wholesalers to the retailers and to the ultimate consumers has been impracticable at present. However, a study group in 1991 did recommend for tax on SMBE, and the government accepted that for the immediate future, a modified SMBE tax law should be

introduced, levied and collected from manufacturers or wholesalers and importers levels. Unlike under the sales tax, services should be made subject to the modified SMBE and only a single rate tax of 5% should be levied.

The tax derived from Small and Medium Business Enterprises (SMBE) constitute a heavy revenue which is essential ingredients in the lubrication and development of any economy.In Nigeria, Small and Medium Scale Enterprises dominate the economy.SMBE are sub-sectors of the industrial sector which play crucial roles in industrial development. Following the adoption of the Economic Reform Programme in Nigeria in 1981, there have been several decisions to switch from capital intensive and large scale industrial projects which was based on the philosophy of import development to Small and Medium Business Enterprises which have better prospects for developing domestic economy, thereby generating the required goods and services that will propel the economy of Nigeria towards development.4 In designing public policies, particularly tax policies, governments have usually targeted their strategies to large companies. Therefore, there is a need to devise methods to encourage the growth and development of these enterprises so as to ensure that they reach their full potentials. Subsequently, a favourable business and regulatory environment needs to be created for them to thrive. The focus on this study on supporting SMBEs growth through tax policy because most large companies have their roots in small and medium enterprises; they started out as SMBEs before expanding. This means that the future large corporations are the

SMBEs today that should be nurtured to ensure their growth.

 

Download Full Material-N5000

Related Post

APPRAISAL OF LEGAL FRAMEWORK GUIDING  VIOLATION OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN NIGERIA

APPRAISAL OF LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK GUIDING  VIOLATION OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN NIGERIA

Overview

Reproductive rights, which include freedoms and rights to autonomy, health, and decision-making around reproduction, are an essential part of human rights. In Nigeria, a complex interaction of institutional, cultural, and legal variables affects the status of women’s reproductive rights. This chapter looks closely at the institutional and legislative structure that governs reproductive rights in Nigeria and evaluates the common violations that prevent women from exercising their right to self-determination and from receiving all the reproductive healthcare they need.

 

Laws Governing Reproductive Rights

 

Nigeria has a legal system that ostensibly protects reproductive rights because it is a signatory to numerous international human rights conventions and treaties. Ratifying international agreements such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which requires the state to guarantee women’s access to reproductive healthcare services and autonomy over their reproductive decisions, is crucial among these.

 

Nigeria’s Constitution protects a number of basic rights, including the rights to life, health, and dignity, which are interpreted to include the right to procreate. The 1999 Constitution recognizes the sanctity of life, the human person’s right to dignity, and the individual’s right to personal liberty under sections 33, 34, and 35. However, due to insufficient enforcement, cultural norms, and statutory loopholes, the practical implementation and preservation of these rights in the context of reproductive health frequently meet difficulties.

 

Institutional Structure and Difficulties

The institutional framework for defending reproductive rights faces many obstacles in spite of legal provisions. Reproductive health promotion is the responsibility of government organizations including the Ministry of Health, National Population Commission, and National Agency for the Control of AIDS (NACA); however, its efficacy is hampered by a lack of funding, poor policy, and uneven execution.

Furthermore, patriarchal systems, religious convictions, and cultural standards all have a big influence on women’s reproductive rights. Customs such as female genital mutilation, forced and early marriages, and son preference restrict women’s autonomy when it comes to making decisions about their reproductive health.

Reproductive Rights Violation

Nigerian women’s reproductive rights are widely and diversely violated. Maternal death and adolescent pregnancy rates are high because of limited access to comprehensive sexual education. Women’s reproductive health is further compromised by obstacles such poor maternal healthcare services, unsafe abortion practices, and restricted access to contraception.

These transgressions are further compounded by stigmatizing and discriminatory practices directed towards women seeking reproductive health services, particularly single women and those from vulnerable groups. The vulnerability of women who experience violations of their reproductive rights is increased in the absence of legal protection and enforcement mechanisms.

In summary

In conclusion, reproductive rights are recognized by Nigerian law and institutions, but there are significant obstacles in the way of their actualization. Women’s reproductive rights are routinely violated due to a combination of social attitudes, legislative loopholes, cultural norms, and inadequate resources. A multimodal strategy including legislative changes, increased healthcare access, educational programs, and the rejection of ingrained social norms that support gender inequality are needed to address these problems.

 

Download Full Material-N5000

AN ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATORY LEGAL FRAME WORK FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN NIGERIA: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

ABSTRACT

What provoked this research is the visibilly wanning national Sovereignty and Jurisdiction of developing Countries to make choice from options in economic, social and cultural policies due to globalization. The need to unravel the challenges the regulatory Legal Frame Work for Foreign investment in Nigeria faces, its impact on our national policies and policy making mechanisms and finding solutions. The methodology employed in this research is the doctrinal research. Primary and secondary materials sourced are analyzed. Foreign investment involves the transfer of a package of resources including capital, technology, management and marketing expertise. This can generally be divided into, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Portfolio Investment (PI) although loans to government (i.e. foreign debts) have also been seen as a third category. The purpose of FDI is to acquire a lasting interest and effective control in the management of an enterprise without necessarily having majority shareholding. Portfolio Investments on the other hand, are directed at earning dividends, interests, capital gains and so on without participating in management.
The Multinational Corporations (MNCs) are major sources of foreign direct investment (FDI).
The regulatory Legal Frame Work is the power of host country through its law and regulatory bodies, authorities, and agencies to control investment activities by providing conditions that affect the behaviour of investors and development of investment to ensure fair and beneficial operations. These agencies including the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission (NIPC), National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion (NOTAP) and Nigeria Oil and Gas Industry Content Development. The regulatory Legal Frame Work for foreign investment in Nigeria is confronted with many issues and challenges which make it impossible to achieve the objectives of government to regulate foreign investment, such as globalization of policy-making which has led to the erosion of national sovereignty, narrowed the ability of governments and people to make choices from options in economic, social and cultural policies; negative influence of the multinational corporations (MNCs) over government policies, lack of commitment on the part of government, non enforcement of penalties and inadequate penalty regimes, ineffective administrative systems and blind adoption of economic terms “dictated” by global markets and international institutions amongst others.
Considering that the regulatory legal frame work plays a crucial role in the economic life of the nation, government should pay adequate attention to it. Consequently, investment policies and regulations should be backed by law to enhance enforcement. The findings indentified in this work show that the penalties in Nigerian Investment Regulatory Frame Work such as Section 55 CAMA and Section 15 (1)(2) NOTAP are inadequate and do not have the force of deterrence. Procedure for exemption of Foreign Company from registration in Nigeria under Section 56 (1)(a)-(d) to the effect that such application should be made to the Council of Ministers through the Secretary to the Government of the Federation. The procedure is unnecessarily cumbersome and time wasting and will discourage donor international organizations and countries willing to undertake specialist projects under contract with any of the Governments in the Federation or their agencies. The National Office for technology Acquirsion and promotion (NOTAP) Act provides for the agency to vet agreements to be submitted to it by Nigerian Companies after negotiating and concluding with the Foreign technical partners and leaves much to be desired in the quest for maximum benefit from technology transfer and Foreign Investment in Nigeria.

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

Title Page i

Declaration ii
Certification iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgement v
Abstract vi
Table of Contents vii
Table of Cases xi
Table of Statutes xii
List of Abbreviations xv
CHAPTER ONE 1
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
1 Background of the Study 1
The Concept and Definition of Foreign
Investment and Regulatory Legal Frame Work 4
1.1.1 Regulatory Legal Frame Work 6
Statement of the Problem 7
Justification/Significance of the study 7
The Aim and Objectives of the Study 9
Limitations/Scope of Study 9
Literature Review 9
Methodology of Research 15
Organizational Layout 16
CHAPTER TWO 17
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF REGULATORY LEGAL FRAME WORK FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN NIGERIA
Introduction 17
The Colonial Period 18
The Post Colonial Period 20
The Indigenization Period 23
The Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) Period Till Date 27
CHAPTER THREE 29
CONTEMPORARY LAWS ON FOREIGN PARTICIPATION IN BUSINESS IN NIGERIA
Introduction 29
Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2004 31
Alliens to Form Companies in Nigeria 32
Consequences of Carrying on Business without Registration 32
Incorporation of a Foreign Company in Nigeria 33
Foreign Companies Exempted from Registration in Nigeria 35
Procedure for Company Exemption from Registration 36
Status of Exempted Companies 37
The Regulation of Foreign Companies 37
The Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission Act 39
Registration and Obtaining of License 40
Guarantee of Investment 40
Settlement of Investment Disputes 41
Immigration Act 42
Basic Permits Required by an Alien to
Enter Nigeria (or enter) and work in Nigeria 43
Entry Permit/Visa 44
Ordinary Visa –Transit 44
Ordinary Visa – Single Journey Visit 45
The short Visit Visa 45
STR Visa (Subject to Regulation) 45
Registration of Aliens 47
Temporary Work permit (T.W.P) 47
Multiple Journey Visa 48
Gratis Courtesy 49
Expatriate Quota 49
Investment and Securities Act (ISA) 52
Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and
Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 53
Industrial Inspectorate Act 54
National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion Act 55
Registration of Contracts and Agreements 55
Effect of Registration of Contracts and Agreements 56
Incentives and Reliefs Available to Investors in
Nigerian Economy 56
Import and Export Incentives under Customs and
Excise Management Act 56
Fiscal Reliefs 58
The Time Factor in Incentives 60
Protectionism in Regulatory Policies 61
Arguments for Protectionism 62
Nigeria Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act 67
First consideration for Nigerian Operators 67
Nigerian Local Content Monitoring Board 68
Content Plan 68
Technology Transfer Plan and Support for Technology Transfer in Nigeria 69
Professional Services 69
Offences and Penalties 69
CHAPTER FOUR
ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OF GLOBALIZATION
Introduction 71
Present Challenges of Globalization on the 72
Nigerian Regulatory Legal Frame Work
The Liberalization of Trade, Finance and Investment 72
The Globalization of Policy-making 78
Rising inequality and the effects of globalization 83
Weaknesses of the Developing nations in facing the globalization challenge 87
The Repeal of Indigenisation Laws 90
The introduction of privatization, commercialization,
Deregulation (Liberalization) in the Nigerian economy 94
Future Challenges of Globalization on Nigerian Regulatory Legal Frame Work 96
Job loss in Nigeria 97
Impact of job loss on national Security 97
Costs and benefits of Foreign Investment to the Nigerian economy 98
Use of Multilateral Framework for Foreign Investment 103
General View 103
Lack of Realization of Anticipated Benefits for Developing Countries
from the Uruguay Round 105
Implementation challenges Faced by Developing Countries from
the Uruguay Round 108
Moves for New Issues in WTO 115
The Approach Needed 116
CHAPTER FIVE 119

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary 119
5.2 Conclusion 122
5.3 Recommendations 124
Bibliography 126

TABLE OF CASES PAGE

E.I.I.A. V C.I.E Ltd (2006) 4 NWLR 114 at 127
33

Kehinde V Registrar of Companies (1979) 3LRN 213 at 220 – 221
25

Oil Field Supply Centre Ltd V Johnson No. 2 (1987) 2LWLR 625
49

Unipetrol Nigeria PLC V Agip Nigeria PLC (2002) 4 NWLR 312 at 330 – 331
32,33

TABLE OF STATUTES PAGE

Aid to Pioneer Industries Ordinance 1952 19
Banking Act 1969 24
Companies Act 1968 24, 31
Companies Act Cap. 37 LFN 1958 31
Company and Allied Matters Decree (No 1) 1990 32
Company and Allied Matters Act Cap. C. 20 LFN 32,40
S. 20 (4) 32,40
S. 54 (1) 32,33
S.55 33,38
S. 56 (1) 33
S. 56 (2) 37
S. 56 (3) 37
S. 58 37
S. 60 (a) 37
S. 57 (a) 37
Companies Ordinance 1922 31
Customs and Excise Management Act Cap. C. 45 LFN 2004. 56
S. 56 56
S. 57 57
Customs Duties (Dumping and Subsidized Goods) Act 1958 19
Custom Drawback Regulations Act 1959 19
Companies Income Tax Act Cap. C. 21 LFN 2004 59
S. 29 59
S. 33 59
SS. 34 – 35 59
S. 9 (1) 59
S. 9 (7) 59
S. 28 (c) (3) 59
S. 22 (3) 59
S. 28 (b) 59

Copy Right Act 1970 24
Exchange Control Act 1962 22
S. 7 22
Export (Incentives and Miscellaneous Provisions Act Cap. E. 19 30
Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004
Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions)
Act Cap. F.34 Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2004 53
S. 15 (1) 53
S. 15 (2) 53
S. 15 (4) 53
S. 17 (1) 54
S. 12 54
S. 13 54
Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Act 1995
S. 26 (1) 91
S. 15 (1) 22
Immigration Act 1963 53
Immigration Act Cap. I.I Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004
S. 8 (1) (a) (b) 42,45
S. 8 (2) (a) (b) 43
S. 10 (2) (a) (b) 43
S. 33 46
Income Tax (Amendment) Ordinance 1952 19
Income Tax (Amendment) Act 1959 19
Industrial Development (Import Duties Relief) Act 1957 19
Industrial Development (Income Tax Relief) Act 1958 19,20
Industrial Development (Income Tax Relief) Act Cap. 1.7 Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004
59
S. 10 59
Industrial Development Coordinating Committee Act No. 36 of 1988 39
Industrial Inspectorate Act Cap. 1.8 Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004 54
S.3 54

S. 3 (3) 54
Investments and Securities Act 2007 No. 29 52
S. 13 (L) 52
Minerals Act Cap. M. 12 Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2004 59
National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion Act Cap. N. 62 55
Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004 55
S. 4 (d) 55
S. 5 (1) – (3) 55
S. 7 56
Nigerian Enterprises Promotion Acts, 1972 and 1977 24
Nigerian Enterprises Promotion (Issues of Non-Voting Equity Shares) Act 1987 24
Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission Act Cap. N 1. 17 Laws
of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004 39
S. 17 39
S. 18 39
S. 31 39
S. 20 40
S. 24 (1) (2) (3) 40, 54
S. 26 (1) (2) (3) 42
Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission Act No. 16 of 1995 39
Nigerian Liquified Natural Gas (Fiscal Incentives Guarantees and
Assurances) Act Cap. N. 87 Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004 60
S. 2
Patents and Designs Act, 1990 24
Petroleum Act 1969 24
Petroleum Profits Tax Act Cap.P. 13 Laws of
the Federal Republic of Nigeria 2004 58
African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA), 2000
S. 106 60
S. 114 60

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ABU – Ahmadu Bello University AGOA – African Growth Opportunity Act
AHFE – Association of Head of Federal Establishments BPO – Business Process Outsourcing
CAC – Corporate Affairs Commission CAMA – Companies and Allied Matters Act CAP – Common Agricultural Policy CBN – Central Bank of Nigeria
C of O – Certificate of Occupancy
ECOWAS – Economic Community of West African States EPZ – Export Processing Zone
FAO – Food and Agricultural Organization
FEMMA – Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous) Act FDI – Foreign Direct Investment
FPI – Foreign Private Investment
GATT – General Agreement Tariffs and Trade GDP – Gross Domestic Product
HDP – Human Development Report
IDDC – Industrial Development Coordination Committee IMM – Immigration
IMF – International Monetary Fund
IPRs – Intellectual Property Rights
IR – Immigration Responsibility
ISA – Investments and Securities Act
JCA – Justice of the Court of Appeal LDCs – Least Developing Countries LRN – Law Report of Nigeria
MIA – Multilateral Investment Agreement MNCs – Multinational Corporations

MPJFIL – Modern Practice Journal of Finance and Investment Law NEP – Nigerian Enterprises Promotion
NEPB – Nigerian Enterprises Promotion Board NGOS – Non – Governmental Organizations NEPC – Nigerian Enterprises Promotion Act
NIPC – Nigeria Investment Promotion Commission NIPCA – Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission Act NWLR – Nigeria Weekly Law Report
NOTAP – National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion OECD – Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
P.I. – Portfolio Investment
PUR – Permanent Until Reviewed
SAP – Structural Adjustment Programme STR – Subject to Regularization
TDR – Trade and Development Report
TRIPS – Trade – Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights TRIMS – Trade – Related Investment Measures
TNCs – Transnational Corporations TWP – Temporary Work Permit
UNCTAD – United Nations Conference on Trade and Development USA – United States of America
WTO – World Trade Organization

Download Full Material-N5000

COLONIAL BOUNDARIES AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN AFRICA WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE AEC AND ECOWAS TREATIES

COLONIAL BOUNDARIES AND ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN AFRICA WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE AEC AND ECOWAS TREATIES

Abstract:

Africa’s existing international boundaries are a product of the colonial partition in the 19th Century. Following independence, the colonial territories became sovereign nation states divided by the lines of colonial demarcation along with a series of commercial, linguistic, political and legal barriers. These barriers, imposed and reinforced by the international law regime relating to state boundaries, and sovereignty constitute impediments to inter-state or intra-regional intercourse and overall economic development on the continent. One major obstacle has been the narrow territorial frameworks or limited internal markets of individual countries which hamper economies of scale, higher productivity and international competitiveness. Several regional economic co-operation projects have been tried within the context of existing international law and inter-state diplomacy with little or no success. This work is an effort to assess current efforts at regional economic integration at the continental and sub-regional levels against the background of the rules governing international boundaries and their impact on inter-state or intraregional economic relations. Particular alien!ion is focused on the Treaties establishing the African Economic Community (1991) and the Economic Community of West African States (1975 as revised in 1993). Chapter one is the general introduction. It sets out the conceptual framework and objectives of the the work; the research problem and scope of the work. It also highlights the significance of the study, and its methodology. Chapter Two deals with the history of border and economic relations in Africa. It attempts to provide historical glimpses into the state of pre-colonial political economy and trade on the continent before the contact with Europe from about the 14th century. It also examines the notion of boundaries in Africa’s precolonial political formations. Lastly it looks at the European penetration and subsequent colonisation of Africa and their impact on indigenous commercial intercourse and state organisation. Chapter Three looks at the legal implications of independence for colonial territories in Africa and the associated problems of legal title to territory arising from the principles of classical international law. The chapter also examines the problems of stale boundaries in African economic relations especially in connection with informal transborder trade. Chapter Four considers the historical background to the idea of continental economic integration in Africa. It discusses existing integration projects on the continent. It also attempts to outline the legal framework, structure, status and scope of the African Economic Community as reflected in the Abuja Treaty of Chapter five examines the provisions of the Abuja Treaty which seek to address the constraints to inter-state or intra-regional trade, namely the rules stipulating for freedom of movement, residence and establishment for citizens of member states in each other’s territory. These are compared to free movement regimes in other regions and the legal harmonisation framework that supports those regimes. Chapter Six addresses the problems of integration in Africa with particular reference to the experiences of ECOWAS. Strict border maintenance policies and undue attachment to notions of sovereignty are identified as the major obstacles to integration against the socioeconomic realities in the sub-region. Chapter seven then identifies the major responses to the prevalence of strict border regimes in the Nigerian and African contexts and evaluates these against the wider imperatives of continental economic integration. It recommends an enabling framework for transborder co-operation that may be adopted from the European model. Chapter Eight summarises the major recommendations of the thesis. It concludes by reiterating the desirability of economic integration in Africa and the necessity for instituting more liberal border management policies that would reduce the negative, exclusionary functions of international boundaries on the continent while promoting free movement and intra-regional intercourse across the continent.

Download Full Material-N5000