NIGERIA AND CHILD MARRIAGE: LEGAL ISSUES, COMPLICATIONS, IMPLICATIONS, PROSPECTS AND SOLUTIONS

NIGERIA AND CHILD MARRIAGE: LEGAL ISSUES, COMPLICATIONS, IMPLICATIONS, PROSPECTS AND SOLUTIONS

Abstract

Child marriage is often deployed as a response to crisis, considered by families and communities to be the best possible means of protecting children. Fear of rape and sexual violence, of unwanted pregnancies outside marriage, of family shame and dishonour, of homelessness and hunger or starvation were all reported by parents and children as legitimate reasons for child marriage in some localities.Poverty, weak legislative frameworks and enforcement, harmful traditional practices, gender discrimination and lack of alternative opportunities for girls (especially education) are all major drivers of child marriage. However this researchers finds in addition to the above mentioned that lack of political will coupled with multiplicities of laws accounts for non-apprehension and prosecution of offenders thereby allowing them to hide under religion and continue to perpetrate crime against humanity. This study is an attempt to fill the void and chart the way out into a brighter and not bleak future for the girl child using data in our content analysis. We hope that stakeholders most especially government and the National Assembly can rise to the challenge and harmonise all laws necessary to deter child marriage in Nigeria.

Download Full Material-N5000

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

The Legal Framework of CBN to Make Monetary Policy Decision on Naira Redesign in Nigeria

CHAPTER ONE/INTRODUCTION

The CBN Act mandates that the Central Bank manage monetary policy in a neutral and autonomous manner. There is a contentious debate about whether the Central Bank should be obligated to the government in light of the importance of monetary policy to long-term economic development. The Free Market (FM) argues in favor of a body that oversees monetary policy and is totally free of party political influence. According to the Governed Market model (GM), monetary policy should not take priority over the strategic economic policy choices made by elected authorities. The FM method was adopted by Nigeria and placed into the CBN Act. It gives the Board of Governors the power to determine monetary policy without interference from elected or appointed partisan government officials. It should be noted that the only prerequisite for the Naira’s design is the President’s mandatory approval under Section 19 of the CBN Act.

Law does not mandate that the CBN inform or seek approval from the Ministry of Finance. Yet, the President’s choice and approval should be discussed in the Federal Executive Council’s weekly meeting for the purpose of economic coherence. This is due to the fact that, despite the CBN’s involvement in the currency redesign, the choice to do so is a result of the Federal Government’s monetary policy and will have a substantial impact on the economy and society. The lack of communication across the whole government demonstrates the dysfunction of the Buhari administration.

In accordance with Section 20 of the CBN Act and in accordance with Section 18 of the same Act, the Bank is authorized to call in any of its funds upon payment of face value and with reasonable notice (d). The role of Banks to the transition is described in Section 19. Banks must only use legal tender while doing transactions. They serve as a conduit for trade and the bartering of goods for cash.

 

 

Download Full Material-N5000

ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE

ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN GOMBE STATE: AN APPRAISAL

ABSTRACT

The main aims and objectives of this desertion titled; “ ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN GOMBE STATE: AN APPRAISAL is to appraise, evaluate, estimate and review the level of efficacy of the application of the Death Penalty in Nigeria, whether the retention of this Penalty in our Criminal Justice System is effective or not? Presently the international community is moving towards total abolition of the Death Penalty for all crimes, the United Nations Resolution No 62/149 and 63/168 calling for moratorium of the use of the Death Penalty has been ratified by the Nigerian Government but is yet to be domesticated into its laws. Prisons records as at 10th November 2015 shows that Nigeria has about 1,669.00 convicts on Death Row cells, many of them have been convicted for more than 10 years. The legal technicalities involved coupled with the refusal of many State Governors to sign death warrants has made it difficult if not impossible to carry executions, therefore many death row inmates live in constant fear and agony for many years and serving a separate term of punishment not initially part of their original sentence. Prison records also shows 1from year 2000 to 2015 death row inmates rose from 435 in year 2000 to 1,669 inmates in December 2014, almost 383.6% increase, during this 15 years only 12 executions were carried on. Nigerian prisons cannot coup with this increase due to lack of adequate facilities to keep this inmates. Therefore this thesis aims at evaluating these problems and recommend solutions to it.

 

The thesis is divided into five chapters, the first chapter contains the main introduction, the reasons behind embarking on this research such as aims and objectives, justification, methodology, literature review, the scope of the research is focusing on Gombe State as a case study, with references to other North East States in order to get an accurate result that can be applicable to other states of the Federation.. The second chapter contain the concept of Criminal Justice System and its dimensions this include an overview of the legal frame work for the Criminal Justice System appraising the penalty under the Military regime, the Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, The Criminal Procedure Act, the Sharia Penal Laws, the offences that attracts death penalty in Nigerian. Methods of execution and the role of other organs like Police, Attorney General, Prisons who are responsible for the administration of Criminal Justice System. In chapter 3 the researcher discussed the argument for or against the death penalty, presenting both arguments and Nigerian concern over the penalty and finally the general assessment of the two arguments. Chapter 4 is the empirical aspect of the thesis, where the researcher conducted a field research by visiting prisons, distributing questionnaires, conducting face to face interviews with the stake holders in the Administration of Criminal justice System in Nigeria to get real facts on the ground which can give accurate information on the application of death penalty.

 

Finally, chapter V contains the summary, observation and recommendation. The findings indicated that most of those who participated in the study are in favor of the application of Death Penalty. The finding also showed that Nigerian prisons are not fit to serve as rehabilitations centers, most if not all our prisons were built around 1960 or thereabout with little or no facilities to serves as prisons, also the findings revealed that inmates lives in constant fear of Death every day while awaiting their execution. in the opinion of human

right actives that constant fear amount to mental torture, ( anticipation of Death is worse than Death itself) the findings also indicated that many death row inmates favored the idea of introducing the concept paying blood money (Diya) than face death penalty (which is natural) all this and many other findings are contained in chapter five.

 

Finally the research recommended the retention of the application of Death Penalty in Nigeria, restructuring the Criminal Justice System, rehabilitate the Nigerian prisons, Government should facilitate speedy trials for capital offenders, and where possible introduce the concept of “Diyah” to save the life of the convict as “Diya” will also allow the victim‟s family to gets some compensations (financial benefits). Finally it is recommended that the Supreme Court must confirmed all the death sentences before execution can be carried on, this will go long way in reducing the miscarriage of justice, the fear, the mental torture this inmates are experiencing in prison for years.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page – – – – – – – – – – I
Declaration – – – – – – – – – – ii
Certification – – – – – – – – – iii
Dedication – – – – – – – – – – IV
Acknowledgment – – – – – – – – – v
Abstract – – – – – – – – – – VI
List of Abbreviations – – – – – – – – vii
List of Statutes – – – – – – – – – viii-
List of Cases – – – – – – – – – ix
Table of Contents – – – – – – – – – xii

CHAPTER ONE

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

1.1 General Introduction – – – – – – – 1
1.2 Statement of the Research Problem – – – – – – 6
1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Research – – – – – – 10
1.4 Scope of the Research – – – – – – – – 10

1.5 Significance of the Research – – – – – – – 11
1.6 Research Methodology – – – – – – – – 11
1.7 Literature Review – – – – – – – – 12
1.8 Organizational Layout – – – – – – – – 13
CHAPTER TWO

THE CONCEPT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND ITS DIMENSIONS

2.1 Introduction – – – – – – – – 33
2.2 An overview of the legal frame of Criminal Justice System in Nigeria – 34
2.3. Death Penalty under Military Regime – – – – – 36

2.4 Death Penalty under the Criminal Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015- 36-38
2.5 Death Penalty under the Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code of the North -38-42
2.6 Death Penalty under the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Act of the South —-
– – – – – – – – – – – 42-44
2.7 The Sharia based penal Laws – – – – – – 44 -49
2.7.1 Adultery or Zina – – – – – – – – 49 -50
2.7.2 Homosexuality (Liwat) – – – – – – – 50

2.7.3 Robbery (Hiraba) — – – – – – – 51
2.7.4 Apostasy (Ridda) – – – – – – – 51
2.7.5 Murder (Qatal) – – – – – – – – 52
2.8 Offences that attract death penalty under the Nigerian Criminal Law – – 53
2.8.1 Treason – – – – – – – – – 53
2.8.2 Armed Robbery – – – – – – – – 53
2.8.3 Instigating invasion of Nigeria – – – – – – 54
2.8.4 Giving false evidence leading to execution of innocent person – 54
2.8.5 Treachery – – – – – – – – 54
2.9 Methods used in executing convict in Nigeria – – – – – 57
2.9.1 Beheading – – – – – – – – 57
2.9.2 Electric chair – – – – – – – – 59
2.9.3 Gas chamber – – – – – – – – 59

2.10 Major Organs responsible with the Administration of Criminal Justice System in

Nigeria – – – – – – – – – 59
2.10.1 The Courts – – – – – – – – 60

2.10.2 The Nigerian Police – – – – – – – 62
2.10.3 The Attorney General – – – – – – – 63
2.10.4 Nigerian prisons – – – – – – – – 64
2.10.5 The Nigerian Bar Association – – – – – – 67
A) The Legal Aid Council – – – – – – – – 68
B) Human Right Commission – – – – – – – 68

CHAPTER THREE

ARGUMENT FOR AND ANGAINST THE APPLICATION OF DEATH PENALTY IN NIGERIA

3.1 Introduction – – – – – – – – – 69
3.2 The origin of the movement for the abolition of death penalty – – – 70
3.3 Nigerian concern over the abolition of death penalty – – – – 77
3.3.1 Argument of the proponents of death penalty – – – – 79
3.3.2 Argument of the opponents of death penalty – – – – – 83
3.4 An assessment of the two arguments for and against the application of death penalty –
– – – – – – – – – – 87

CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 Introduction – – – – – – – – 93
4.2 Method of data collection and analysis – – – – – 95
4.3 Summary of condemned convicts in Nigerian prison from year 2000 to Dec 2015 – 86
4.5 Data analysis – – – – – – – – – 101
4.6 Data analysis related to Judges, Lawyers and officers in the Administration of Criminal
Justice System — – – – – – – – 113
4.5 Conclusion – – – – – – – – – 122

CHAPTER FIVE

5.1 introduction – – – – – – – – 123
5.2 Summary – – – – – – – – – – 123
5.3 Findings – – – – – – – – – – 124
5.4 Recommendations – – – – – – – – 128 -132
Bibliography – – – – – – – – – – 134
Article – – – – – – – – – – 136
Report – – – – – – – – – – 137
Appendix – – – – – — – – – 138

Download Full Material-N5000

THE ROLE OF NIGERIAN COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

THE ROLE OF NIGERIAN COURTS AND TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

ABSTRACT

The judicial powers of the Federation and of States are vested in Courts established by section 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and other courts established for the Federation by an Act of the National Assembly or in case of States, Law made by the relevant State House of Assembly. The Judicial powers gradually, due to increase in litigations and criminal trials beyond the capacity of the regular courts, were no longer exclusive to the Courts but rather had to be shared with tribunals established for particular purposes. This development consequently brought about two parallel systems of adjudicating institutions operating side by side.

While some tribunals, like the investment and Securities Tribunal, have justified their establishment by dispensing Justice timeously and by experts in the particular field of the tribunal’s jurisdiction, others seem to have defeated the very essence of their establishment like Code of Conduct Tribunals. Tribunals like the Code of Conduct Tribunal apart from being redundant is seen as an agent of the Federal Government since it is absolutely controlled by the Code of Conduct Bureau, which is directly under the Presidency. This explains the redundant nature of the tribunal as it serves more or less as a stooge of the Presidency from where most of the culprits should have been arraigned.

 

The Laws establishing various tribunals have their inbuilt shortcomings that hinder the trial procedure or occasion unnecessary delays contrary to the very essence of establishing the tribunals.

The courts in Nigeria could be said to have contributed in some measure to the development of Law, particularly in the field of animal Law and Constitutional Law. However administration of Justice seems to suffer several challenges. Some of these challenges were attributed to factors associated with adversarial system, coupled with rancorous nature of proceedings and so on. Details of this has been vividly elucidated. The development in respect of funding of Courts has been pointed out.

CHAPTER ONE/ GENERAL INTRODUCTION

The court of law is an organ belonging to the judiciary department in the 3 arms of government in Nigeria. Public administration of justice is the primary function of the court. The courts are established with certain powers. The doctrine of separation of powers, places the three arms of government (Executive, Legislature and the Judiciary) on equal pedestals but with different areas of authority and responsibility. While the executive, implements laws enacted by the legislature in the course of governance, the courts interprets same for easy implementation. The courts, therefore, has long been an instrument of stabilization and a tool for administration of civil Justice.

Administration of justice is one of the vital functions of the courts. Generally, the word justice may mean reasonableness, fairness, equality of treatment e.t.c however, the courts have the most authoritative say in the determination and pronouncement of what justice is in every situation involving

 

claims and counter claims to legal rights and duties. Justice viewed in this context is an attempt to define the workings of the Nigerian courts in relation to how it determine and adjudicate matters brought before it. Relevant to this, is the concept of fair hearing, composition of the courts and the correctness of procedural rules. All these must be taken into account before the courts can perform its role and function Justiciably; hence section 36 of the 1999 constitution emphasizes on the right to fair hearing both in civil and criminal matters. This implies both substantive and procedural fairness taking into accounts jurisdiction and composition of courts.

The relevance of the courts has been emphasized by the jurists and writers to include as part of the functioning tools in governance. A court occupies a very unique position and performs near omnipotent functions, deriving from the role assigned to it in the constitution1. In Nigeria, the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) provides that, “The judicial power of the federation shall be vested in the courts.”2 This power includes the power to adjudicate disputes between all persons, government and any person, interpretation of the law, determination of appropriateness of all actions, proceedings, citizens’ rights and obligations of government, agencies, corporate bodies or persons.3 The

 

functions of the courts therefore, include the promotion of justice, rule of law, stability, democracy, human rights and good governance and opportunity for sustainable progress, all of which form the bedrock of civil justice. In other words, the courts play a vital role in ensuring justice, by enabling a conducive atmosphere for

individuals and groups to appreciate their potentials and strive to contribute their quota in dispensation of justice. The court does not only guarantee humane and tolerable governance but also ensures stability in the political system4.

As highlighted above, the judicial powers of the Federation and of States are vested in courts established by section 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and other courts established for the Federation by an Act of the National Assembly or in case of states, law made by the relevant State House of Assembly. The judicial powers gradually, due to increase in litigations and criminal trials beyond the capacity of the regular courts,

 

were no longer exclusive to the courts but rather had to be shared with tribunals established particular purpose. This development consequently brought about two parallel systems of adjudicating institutions operating side by side.

While some tribunals, like the investment and Securities Tribunals, have justified their establishment by dispensing justice timeously and by experts in the particular filed of the tribunal’s jurisdiction, others seem to have defeated the very essence of their establishment like Special Military Tribunals, which hardly respect the fundamental right to fair hearing much less any other right. Tribunals like the Code of Conduct Tribunal apart from……………

 

Download Full Material-N5000