APPRAISAL OF FEDERAL INLAND REVENUE  COLLECTION SYSTEM

APPRAISAL OF FEDERAL INLAND REVENUE  COLLECTION SYSTEM

 

ABSTRACT

A tax is a compulsory levy imposed on the income or profit of an individual, partnership and corporate organisations for the financing of government expenditure without recourse to a corresponding benefit from tax payer.  Assessments are raised on total profit at the rate of either 30 percent or 20 percent if it is a small company whose turnover is below 1million naira.  Various types of assessment s are raised on the company.  This could be self-assessment, government assessment, back year assessment, best of judgement (BOJ) assessment or jeopardy assessment. Collection is basic necessity to tax revenue after assessment has been raised.  This research work is aimed at appraising the tax collection system in Nigeria taking Federal Inland Revenue Service as a case study.  It examined the workings both at the local and state levels but focused more on the Federal Inland Revenue Services.  It reviewed the old system, the reasons why a new idea muffed.  The operations of the new method were also explained and clearly stated.  The methodology adopted in this study is the survey research design. There were interactions with staff of Federal Inland Revenue Service of various cadres and a few tax payers and tax consultants with structured questionnaire to know their opinion.  56 questionnaires were administered out of which 35 were duly completed and returned.  The findings from research work revealed that appraisal of tax collection system will bring more money to the coffer of the government and all incidents of frauds, cheque diversion and other malpractices will be curbed. Based on the findings of this study, recommendations made are that constant monitoring of the activities of the designated banks is necessary to determine their level of compliance while adequate training should be provided for collection staff to enhance their efficiency and productivity.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

  • BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

A tax is a compulsory levy imposed on the income/profits of an individual, partnership and corporate organizations for the financing of government expenditure without recourse to a corresponding benefit from tax payer.

Every tax imposed on Nigerian companies or organisations needs continual interpretation of its specific application and effect on the various transaction of the organisation.       The field of taxation changes every moment or every day as announced by the new ruling courts and also as are being made by new government.

Tax is paid only on the profit of the company after all other deductions and allowances such as capital allowance, investment allowances.  The rate of tax levied and payable for each year of assessment in respect of the total profit of every company is thirty kobo for every naira as contained in section 29 of Companies Income Tax Act 2007 as amended.  A company which is yet to commence business after at least 6 months of incorporation shall for each year it obtains a tax clearance certificate pay a levy of (a) ₦20,000 for the first year and (b) ₦25,000 for every subsequent year before a tax clearance certificate is issued.

Where in any of the basis period for the year of assessment in which a company commenced business and the next following four years of assessment as determined under the provision of section 29 of the Act, a Nigerian company engaged in manufacturing or agricultural production, mining of solid minerals or wholly export trade, earns a total gross sales (turnover) of below one million naira, there shall be levied and paid by the company, tax at the rate of twenty kobo on every naira of the total profits.

Section 28A of Companies Income Tax Act 2007 states that where in any year of assessment the ascertainment of total assessable profits from all sources of a company results in a loss or where a company’s ascertained total profits results in no tax payable or tax payable which is less than the minimum tax then shall be levied and paid by the company the minimum tax as prescribed in subsection (2) of the Act.

(a)    If the turnover of the company is ₦500,000 or below and the company has been in business for at least few calendar years, be;

 

(i)     0.5 percent of gross profits or

(ii)    0.5 percent of net assets or

(iii)   0.25 percent of paid up capital or

(iv)   0.25 percent of turnover of the years, whichever is higher.

If the turnover is higher 500,000 be whatever is payable in paragraph (a) of this subsection plus such addition tax on the amount by which the turnover is in excess of ₦500,000 at a rate which shall be 0.125 percent.

The provision shall not apply to a company carrying on agriculture trade or business or the company with at least 25 percent imported equity capital and lastly, any company for the first four calendar years of its commencement of business.

Collection is basic necessity to tax revenue after assessment has been raised.  The tax payer is expected to pay the assessed tax liabilities to any of the collecting banks in his or her region with the assessment notices indicating the tax type being paid.  This could be company income tax, Education tax, Capital gains tax, Personal Income Tax for resident of Abuja, and non resident individuals, Value Added Tax.

 

After the payment, the tax payer will be issued an electronically generated receipt from the bank (e-ticket), then, the collecting bank is expected to remit the funds same day to lead bank via Inter Switch net work.  The lead bank remits to Central Bank of Nigeria after two days.  The e-receipt and on line schedule of remittance by lead banks are forwarded to Federal Inland Revenue Service office and checked before receipts are issued.

The FIRS taxes are being collected by agents.  These agents are the collecting banks.  These are twenty four in number (24).  The Lead banks are four (4), Ministry Departments and Agencies, Nigerian Customs Services, The medium of collection are cash, cheque and electronic transfers.

Accounting for revenue collected is mandatory for FIRS to all relevant government agencies and stake holders.  The accounting procedure is as follows:

Firstly, all revenues collected through the web portal/pay direct, KP Morgan statement of account, Auto Swift are generated.

Secondly, the receipts of schedule of VAT on import from Nigerian Customs Service are collated.  Then reconciliation of receipt of remittances with collecting banks, CBN and others are carried out to ensure proper accountability of the revenues.

There is proper monitoring to ensure that all revenues collected are remitted to the appropriate account to CBN as at when due. The types of monitoring include:

  • On-line monitoring via PEACT
  • Daily monitoring of remittances to CBN
  • On-line viewing of foreign payments
  • Data base on incorporated companies and Enterprises in Abuja
  • Auto swift viewing on line FIRS transactions in CBN
  • Tax payer enumeration database
  • Introduction of TIN (Tax Identification Numbers)
  • Monitoring of business to ensure, remittances of taxes deducted from customers and staff.

There are challenges for collecting Agents.  These include delayed or non remittance of taxes.

Non remittance of Taxes:

It has been observed that some of these collecting agents deliberately delayed the remittance of taxes paid and in most cases these payments are not remitted at all to the coffer of Federal Inland Revenue Services.

Delayed Posting:  This is a situation whereby banks collect cash or cheques for FIRS and refuse to post as and when due, this can be deliberate or not.  This can be noticed when posting is made as huge cash deposit, extended numbers of days, cheque value date, non stamping of deposit slips, deposit slip date being different on date of posting on web portal especially on VAT and WHT collecting agents.

On discovery of this type of practice, the Integrated Tax Office (ITO) usually charge appropriate penalties and interest as follows:

 

Steps to deal with Delayed Postings

  • Identify the period of delay
  • Impose 1% penalty on the principal amount delayed
  • For delayed below 30 days impose interest at NIBOR rate + 3% i.e
  • Amount x (NBOR +3%) x No Days Delayed

No of days in year

  • Where the Number of days is above 30days
  • Penalty is charged at 1% flat of the principal sum

Non-remittance: This comes about when a bank collects FIRS cheques/cash and refuses to remit out rightly.  Here the money is diverted for use by the bank forever.  The situation is aggregated by the tax payer not demanding for his e-ticket or receipt.

The detection of the above shoddy deals can be made by the adoption of the following methods:

  • Know your customers (tax payers)
  • Visit tax payers to enquire of their payments
  • And obtain evidence
  • Check payment made against web portal
  • Reconcile with the receiving banks and request for posting immediately

When payment is posted, calculate appropriate penalties and interests.

 

1.2   STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Tax collection is an important function of the Federal Inland Revenue Service.  However, there are some teething problems that inhibit effective and efficient collection system.  They are as follows:

  1. Inadequate government regulation on collection system
  2. Lack of total commitment and adequate tax policies.
  3. Lack of transparency on the part of the tax administrators.
  4. Frauds committed by both F.R.S staff and collecting agents.
  5. Delay in remitting taxes collected and in some cases outright diversion of taxes collected.
  6. Lacking adequate remuneration for collection staff of F.R.S.
  7. Lack of functional equipments to detect frauds.
  8. Lack of proper monitoring
  9. Lack of shift penalty for erring
  10. There is no proper accountability of the amount collected by various agents by the government and this brings about apathy among the tax payers.

 

1.3   AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

The aim and objective of this research work is to appraise the systems of tax collection generally with special emphasis on the Federal Inland Revenue Services and the possibility of improving it. To do that the following objectives are set:

  1. To investigate whether the subject of every state or community pays tax to support the legitimate authority within the requirement of the social contact.
  2. To investigate whether the tax to be paid is certain in relation to the amount to be paid the authority to collect it, the time or period when it is to be collected.
  3. To investigate whether the tax is simple to understand and administer.
  4. To investigate whether the tax system is flexible in federal and democratic country where there are always changes of government.
  5. To investigate whether the request for payment of taxes is done at a time when it is most convenient for the tax payers.

 

1.4   RESEARCH QUESTION

Based on the objectives stated, the research questions are as follows;

  1. Is every subject of every state or community pays tax to support the legitimate authority within the requirement of the social contact.
  2. Is the tax paid certain in relation to the amount to be paid, the authority to collect it, the time or period is to be collected?.
  3. Is the tax system simple to understand and administer?
  4. Is the tax system flexible in Federal and democratic country where there are always changes of government?
  5. Is the request for payment of tax done at a convenient time for the tax payer?

 

1.5   RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS

In line with the problem statement and the objectives of the study, the following hypotheses are formulated.

H1:   Every subject of every state or community pays tax to support the legitimate authority within the requirement of the social contact.

H2:   The tax paid is certain in relation to the amount to be paid; the authority to collect it, the time or period is to be collected.

 

H3:   The tax system is simple to understand and administer.

H4:   The tax system is flexible in federal and democratic country where there are always changes of government.

H5:   The request for payment of tax is done at a convenient time for the tax payer.

 

1.6   SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The need for efficient and effective tax collection system makes it imperative that a research of this nature be carried out.

Over the years, citizens have been subjected to harsh and intimidating processes with a view to making money for government especially state level where consultants were hired to do the job of state Internal Revenue Departments.  The same harassment threats of tax payers both individuals and corporate bodies were also used during collection of revenue.

Equally too, by undertaking this research, one is privileged to see if the present facilities on the ground are adequate for efficient tax collection or whether there is the need for review.  These facilities are in terms of human and material resources.  On the whole, research work in this area is justified in the light of the above for the defects or anomalies in the process are detected and solutions preferred.

 

 

1.7   SCOPE OF THE STUDY

Several methods of collecting taxes will employed by different states.  However, this research dwells mainly on the collections system in Federal Inland Revenue Services.

 

1.8   LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

It must also be noted that non-availability of materials on this topic can limit the extent of which one can go in this exercise.  While an attempt will be made to review what the topic is all about at the first two levels of governments, our central focus will be the Federal Inland Revenue.  This will entail discussing with the various relevant units, within the service, the means of collecting the taxes, relationship between the designated banks and the service.

1.9   DEFINITION OF TERMS

BALANCING ALLOWANCES:- Where in any accounting period of a company, the company owing any asset in respect of which it has incurred qualifying expenditure wholly and exclusively for the purposes of operations carried on by it, disposes of that asset an allowance shall be due to that company for that accountancy period of the excess of the residue of that expenditure of the date such asset is disposed of was the value of that asset of that date.

BEST OF JUDGEMENT ASSESSMENT    –       This is the assessment raised on the company when returns are not submitted to the Board or where a company has delivered audited accounts and returns, the Board may refuse to accept the return and to the best of the judgement, determine the amount of the total profits of the company and make an assessment accordingly.

DEMAND NOTE:      It is a notice asking a tax payer to pay after interest and penalty might have been computed.

DESIGNATED BANK –      It is a branch of a selected bank zoned to a particular area for the collection of taxes.

F.I.R.S      – Federal Inland Revenue Service.

I.T.M.A-    Income Tax Management Act

JTB     –    Joint Tax Board

LEDGER CARD        –       This is the card where assessments received from assessing section or department are recorded.

OFFSHORE COMPANY    –       A company doing business in Nigeria, deriving income from it but not resident in Nigeria.

P.A.Y.E –  Pay As You Earn

Download Full Material-N5000

Related Post

THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF EFCC IN PROMOTING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY IN NIGERIA

ABSTRACT

Several years of military misrule and mismanagement had weakened the economic management processes and institutions in Nigeria.  There was no transparency and accountability in government (Public Sector) and private sectors and Nigeria became notorious for endemic corruption.  The result was the inability of government to deliver services to the Nigeria public. Most private companies both in the oil and non-oil sector have constantly evade taxes and have collide with officials to evade custom duties and payment of taxes.  In addition, widespread perpetration of economic and financial crimes like advance fee fraud (419), money laundering, cyber crime, banking fraud and endemic corruption have had severe negative consequences on Nigeria, including decreased direct foreign investment in the country.  Consequently, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was established as one of the mechanisms for the prevention, investigation and prosecution of corrupt practices and economic and financial crimes in the public and the private sector.  Finally, this research work is aimed at looking into the various contributions of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in promoting financial accountability and transparency. To achieve this aim five research questions were developed.  The study adopted the survey research approach using the three study areas.  The EFCC Lagos, EFCC Enugu and PHCN formed the population of the study.  A sample size of 55 was choosing using Taro Yamane’s model while simple random techniques was used to select the sample.  Data retrieved from 55 completed questionnaires were subsequently presented in tables while simple percentage were used to analyse and answer the research questions formulated to guide the research work.  After the analysis of data, the hypotheses tested reviewed that the contributions of EFCC has effectively promoted financial accountability and transparency in Nigeria.  Therefore, the researcher recommends the following: developing an intensified information technology, staff training, capacity building and health care fraud control.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1   BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Fraudulent activities, economic mismanagement, corruption, lack of accountability and transparency have been the bane of the economy. Fraud and criminality remained elusive and therefore brought inefficiency in the system, especially in the public sector.

This menace lead to the establishment of EFCC in 2002 by an Act of the National Assembly which was later amended in 2004. It was borne out of the determination of the Federal Government to root out corruption and sanitize the Nigerian economic environment by enforcing all economic and financial crimes laws.

The Act mandates the EFCC to combat financial and economic crimes and the Commission is empowered to prevent, investigate, prosecute and penalize economic and financial crimes. Also, the EFCC is charged with and has been investigating cases of abuse of office, diversion of public funds through fraudulent award of contracts, tax fraud, illegal bunkering, terrorism financing, capital market fraud, cyber crime, banking fraud, etc.

With a mission to curb the menace of corruption that constitutes the clog in the wheel of progress; protect national and foreign investments in the country; imbue the spirit of hard work in the citizenry and discourage the crave for ill-gotten wealth; identify such ill-gotten wealth and confiscate them; build an upright work force in both public and private sector of the economy; and contribute to the global war against financial crimes and terrorism financing; the advent of the EFCC has impacted positively on Nigeria’s global acceptance being a turning point in the country’s anti-corruption crusade.

Since its establishment, the EFCC has taken the bull by the horns working tenaciously to fulfill its mandate. Under the current leadership, it vigorously pursues its mandate of investigating cases earlier highlighted; the Commission has made concerted efforts in identifying, tracing and freezing, confiscating, or seizing proceeds derived from such illicit activities. EFCC, from inception, has also played host to the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), vested with the responsibility of collecting suspicious transactions reports (STRs) from financial and designated non-financial institutions, analyzing and disseminating them to all relevant government agencies and other FIUs all over the world.

So far, the Commission has been able to and still recording successes in several areas of its mandate. Among others, it has recorded several convictions on corruption, money laundering, oil pipeline vandalism and related offences. Assets and money worth over $11 billion have been recovered from corrupt officials and their cohorts. The Commission is tenacious with over 65 high profile cases at advanced stages of prosecution in several courts in Nigeria and over 1500 other cases in court and secured over 600 convictions.

Before then there were other provisions of Financial Crimes Laws such as:

  • Money laundering amendment Acts 2003, No 7; 1995, No
  • The Advance fee fraud and other related offences Act 1995 as amended.
  • The failed Banks (Recovery of Debts) and financial malpractices on Banks Acts 1994 as amended.
  • The Banks and other financial institution Act 1991 as amended.
  • Miscellaneous offences Act 1983.
  • Any other law or regulations relating to economic and financial crimes including the Criminal code and penal code.

The commission is also designated to Nigerian financial intelligent unit (NFIU). It is thus, substantial that our problem is not the absence of legislation (Law) or the deficiencies in them but the total neglect to enforce them have been the plight of disaster,

1.2   STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

A nation where financial and economic crimes are endemic cannot attain economic stability, growth and development. According to Irving Kristol’s (2OO7), the problem is always far more important than devising a solution, for he who can define the problem has always exercised a large degree of intellectual sovereignty over the range of possible solutions that must be imagined

 

 

Nigeria being a country where corruption is pandemic has been rated both domestically and internationally as a corrupt nation. Public officials take huge bribes and the cost of public goods and services are inflated, government often pays for non-existent goods and services. Even when such corrupt practices are exposed, it has always been played to the gallery and sacrificed at the alter of backside bargaining. The corrupt practices that have characterized and painted the nation black include fraud, embezzlement, falsification of financial information, obtaining by false pretence, lack of transparency and accountability among others.

These evils have in no small measure negated economic stability, growth and development in our country. Experience has shown that both the public and private sectors have continued to suffer inefficiency and ineptness and that growth indices and graph are having a downward slope. This has brought the pertinent question — are there adequate control measures and checks to stem this ugly tide (corruption)?

Poor and insincere policy conception, formulation and implementation on economic and financial crimes in Nigeria have been responsible for the low achievement recorded in curbing and stamping out economic and financial crimes in the country. Hence, the emergence of the “Economic and financial crimes commission to enhance financial accountability and transparency in Nigeria.”

 

1.3   AIMS/OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

        The major aim of this study is to assess the contributions of EFCC in promoting financial accountability and transparency in Nigeria.  The objectives include:

  1. To examine the responsibilities and functions of EFCC.
  2. To carry out a comprehensive analysis on the contributions of EFCC in detecting and controlling fraud in Nigeria.
  3. To examine how effective EFCC contributions benefited Nigeria public and private sectors since her inception.
  4. To examine the contributions of EFCC in enhancing financial accountability and transparency.
  5. To effectively examine the achievements and successes of the commission.

 

1.4   RESEARCH QUESTIONS

  1. What are the responsibilities and functions of EFCC?
  2. What are the contributions of EFCC in detecting and controlling fraud in Nigeria?
  3. How effective EFCC contributions benefited Nigeria public and private sector?
  4. What are the contribution of EFCC in enhancing financial accountability and transparency?
  5. What are the achievements and successes of the commission?

1.5   RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

Also in line with objectives and research questions are the hypotheses of this study.

  1. EFCC has no responsibilities and functions assigned for her.
  2. EFCC contributions cannot benefit the Nigeria public and private sector.
  3. There is no achievement and successes on the side of the Commission.
  4. The contributions of EFCC cannot enhance financial accountability and transparency.
  5. EFCC as a machinery cannot effectively detect and control financial and economic irregularities in Nigeria.

 

1.6   SIGNIFICANT OF THE STUDY.

The research work will be useful and moreover be a source of information to the followings

  • Government with this research work will be witty and aware of the extent the activities of EFCC has contributed in administration and controlling of fraud in Nigeria. It will also be of great significant in examining the area of weakness and how best to improve them for effective regulation of fraud.
  • To the academic, the research work will help         them formulate more theories and strategies that will enhance the effectiveness of EFCC in ensuring financial accountability and transparency. It will also contribute to the enrichment of literature on EFCC and serve as a body of reserved knowledge to be referred to by researchers.
  • Public sector, by this we mean all government parastatals, institutions, ministries, corporations etc.        FIUs work will expose them to the activities of        EFCC.
  • Private sector: By this we mean individuals and corporate bodies who have contributed their resources to provide     goods and services to the public at a profit. They carry       out their various activities which are expected to be done        within the ambits of laws and legislations governing their         operations. They include sole proprietorship, partnership,      corporate organizations among others.

 

1.7 SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY.

The scope of this study tries to take a holistic view of the activities of EFCC in Nigeria and how these can help improve financial accountability and transparency. It embraces their operations both in the public and private sectors with the aim of improving financial efficiency.

 

1.8   LIMITATIONS.

This research work would suffer many set backs due to a lot of reasons. One of such is the inaccessibility of information from the office of EFCC. Presently, they are security conscious and unwilling to disclose information and plans available some write ups and journals which would have been helpful for this research work. Ideally, the work should have involved more states but due to some inherent constraint such as time and money but effort would be made to at least touch a great number of states to have a balance view of this research.

1.9   DEFINITION OF TERMS.

  • EFCC: This is an acronym for Economic and Financial crimes commission. It is a commission created by an act   of the National Assembly in 2002 and was amended in       2004. It is charged with the responsibility of investigating    and enforcement of all laws against economic and financial crimes.
  • FRAUD: The crime of deceiving somebody in order to collect money or goods illegally. It also means a person     who pretends to have qualities and abilities, skills etc    that he or she does not really have to deceive others.
  • It is an acronym for Nigeria Financial intelligent unit. It is an autonomous central national agency, domiciled within   EFCC with responsibility of receiving and analyzing financial information.
  • INVESTIGATION: This means a special kind of examination of accounts or records carried on by an       investigator with the predefined purpose according to the         necessity of the situation (Chike Nwoha 2003:33).
Download Full Material-N5000

IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING ON CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN NIGERIA

IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING ON CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN NIGERIA

ABSTRACT 

This study examines the Effect of environmental accounting and reporting on corporate performance. The study adopted a cross section descriptive survey research design and covers a period of ten years. Data collected were analysed using multiple regression analysis. Finding of the study shows that environmental cost accounting is vital for effective performance of a firm.it was noted in the findings that environmental accounting disclosure enable a firm to fully understand the performance state of the organization, hence, making it possible for the firm to know exactly areas to adjust the activities in order to enhance the performance of the firm. The study recommends that Any firm that aim at continuous survival, profit making and effective performance should always carryout environmental cost analysis in order to know their performance level and results obtained from Environmental disclosure of a firm should never be neglected, since it

 

is the bedrock for knowing much more about a firm’s performance. It was also recommended that managers of firm should always implement information’s obtained from environmental cost analysis in order to know areas to improve or adjust the performance of their firm.

Download Full Material-N5000

CAUSES AND EFFECT OF NEGATIVE ATTITUDE TO IMMUNIZATION AMONG COUPLES

CAUSES AND EFFECT OF NEGATIVE ATTITUDE TO IMMUNIZATION AMONG COUPLES

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lack of information has been associated with couples anxiety or concern in a number of healthcare areas.

OBJECTIVES: (1) Identify the proportion of parents who agreed, were neutral, and disagreed that they had access to enough information to make a decision about immunizing their child; (2) examine how parents who agreed and disagreed differed with respect to sociodemographic characteristics, and their attitudes about immunizations, their child’s healthcare provider, immunization requirements/exemptions, and immunization policymakers; and (3) identify if differences exist in specific immunization concerns.

METHODS: A sample of parents with at least one child aged < or =6 years (n=642) was analyzed using data from the HealthStyles survey conducted during July and August 2003. Odds ratios and the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test were used for analysis.

RESULTS: Response rate for HealthStyles was 69% (4035/5845). The largest proportion of parents agreed they had access to enough information (67%) compared to parents who were neutral (20%) or who disagreed (13%). Compared to parents who agreed, parents who disagreed were more likely to be less confident in the safety of childhood vaccines (odds ratio [OR]=5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.3-8.9), and to disagree that their child’s main healthcare provider is easy to talk to (OR=10.3, 95% CI=3.7-28.1). There was a significant linear trend in the percentage of parents expressing immunization concerns among those who agreed, were neutral, and who disagreed they had access to enough information (p<0.05; df=1).

CONCLUSIONS: While most parents agreed that they had access to enough immunization information, approximately a third did not. Perceived lack of information was associated with negative attitudes about immunizations and toward healthcare providers. Basic information about the benefits and risks of vaccines presented by a trusted provider could go a long way toward maintaining and/or improving confidence in the immunization process.

Download Full Material-N5000

Contents